Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Sunday, February 26, 2012
New York City Teacher Ratings: Teacher Data Reports Publicly Released Amid Controversy
Good heavens. It's really embarrassing for kids to graduate high school without being ready for the world, or to drop out with even less preparation for life. It's embarrassing to be a failure in life. The teaching profession should be willing to absorb a bit of embarrassment in the quest for better teaching.
New York City Teacher Ratings: Teacher Data Reports Publicly Released Amid Controversy
02/24/2012
The New York City Department of Education released today a list of individual ratings of thousands of the city's schoolteachers, a move that concludes a lengthy legal battle waged by the local teachers' union and media.
The Teacher Data Reports rate more than 12,000 teachers who taught fourth through eighth grade English or math between 2007 and 2010 based on value-added analysis. Value-added analysis calculates a teacher's effectiveness in improving student performance on standardized tests -- based on past test scores. The forecasted figure is compared to the student's actual scores, and the difference is considered the "value added," or subtracted, by the teachers.
To some, the release means a step forward in using student data and improving transparency and accountability by giving parents access to information on teacher effectiveness. To others, it's a misguided over-reliance on incomplete or inaccurate data that publicly shames or praises educators, whether deserving or not...
New York City Teacher Ratings: Teacher Data Reports Publicly Released Amid Controversy
02/24/2012
The New York City Department of Education released today a list of individual ratings of thousands of the city's schoolteachers, a move that concludes a lengthy legal battle waged by the local teachers' union and media.
The Teacher Data Reports rate more than 12,000 teachers who taught fourth through eighth grade English or math between 2007 and 2010 based on value-added analysis. Value-added analysis calculates a teacher's effectiveness in improving student performance on standardized tests -- based on past test scores. The forecasted figure is compared to the student's actual scores, and the difference is considered the "value added," or subtracted, by the teachers.
To some, the release means a step forward in using student data and improving transparency and accountability by giving parents access to information on teacher effectiveness. To others, it's a misguided over-reliance on incomplete or inaccurate data that publicly shames or praises educators, whether deserving or not...
Labels:
embarrassment,
evaluating teachers,
New York,
test scores
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)